25.
PASSAGE (Next 3 Questions)
Read the following passage carefully and answer the question given below it.
Morality is often conceived as a system of determinate prescriptions, offering clarity through the delineation of right and wrong. Yet such determinacy is frequently illusory, for moral life unfolds in contexts where principles intersect, conflict, and resist straightforward application. Under such conditions, morality cannot be reduced to the execution of rules; it instead demands the capacity to adjudicate among competing claims without relinquishing coherence. The moral agent must therefore navigate between generality and specificity, ensuring that universal commitments are neither abandoned nor applied without regard for contextual nuance. This navigation introduces a fundamental tension: morality seeks consistency in judgment, yet cannot dispense with situational responsiveness. Rigid adherence to principle risks producing outcomes that contravene the very values those principles intend to secure, while excessive flexibility risks dissolving morality into relativism. The resolution of this tension lies not in privileging one pole over the other, but in sustaining a form of reasoning that remains accountable to both. Thus, morality emerges not as a static code but as an ongoing practice of justification, requiring individuals to render their actions intelligible in light of both principle and circumstance.
Read the following statements carefully and choose the most appropriate option.
Assertion (A): Moral judgment must remain coherent even when principles conflict in complex situations.
Reason (R): Moral reasoning requires evaluating competing principles beyond mere reliance on fixed rules.