The question asks about the current composition of the Election Commission of India. To answer this, one needs to recall the constitutional provisions and subsequent amendments regarding the structure of the Election Commission.
C) 1 Chief Election Commissioner + 2 Election Commissioners. This accurately reflects the current multi-member composition of the Election Commission of India, which has been in effect since 1993.
The question asks about the appointing authority for the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and other Election Commissioners (ECs) in India. This is a direct question related to the constitutional provisions governing the Election Commission of India.
Correct Option: C) President of India
The question asks about the composition of the selection committee for appointing the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners (ECs) as per the 2023 Act. This requires knowledge of recent legislative changes regarding the appointment process of these constitutional functionaries.
A) Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, and a Union Cabinet Minister nominated by the PM. This option accurately reflects the composition of the selection committee as established by The Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023.
The question asks about the subject matter of a significant Supreme Court case, Anoop Baranwal vs Union of India (2023). To answer this, one needs to recall the key judgments and their implications from recent Indian legal history, particularly those concerning constitutional bodies and electoral reforms.
Correct Option: C) Appointment process of Election Commissioners
The Supreme Court, in the Anoop Baranwal vs Union of India case (2023), delivered a significant verdict aimed at ensuring the independence of the Election Commission of India. The Court ruled that the Chief Election Commissioner and Election Commissioners should be appointed by the President based on the advice of a committee consisting of the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha (or the leader of the single largest opposition party), and the Chief Justice of India. This judgment was specifically about reforming the appointment process of Election Commissioners to safeguard the integrity of the electoral process.
The question asks whether the Constitution prescribes any qualifications for the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC). To answer this, we need to recall the constitutional provisions related to the Election Commission of India.
D) True — The Constitution of India does not prescribe any specific qualifications (legal, educational, administrative, or judicial) for the appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner. This is a notable feature, leaving the appointment largely to the executive's discretion, albeit with recent legislative changes regarding the selection committee.
The question asks about the tenure of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) in India. This is a factual question related to the Indian Constitution and the Election Commission of India. We need to recall the specific provisions regarding the service conditions of the CEC.
D) 6 years or until the age of 65, whichever is earlier
This option correctly states the tenure of the Chief Election Commissioner as per the Election Commission (Conditions of Service of Election Commissioners and Transaction of Business) Act, 1991.